Standard vs Pro: what changes?
Updated October 2026 · 2 min read
Compare the complete rule set
| Programm | Evaluation targets | Tages- / Maximalverlust | Days per stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Stufe Standard | 10% | 4% / 7% | 5 at ≥0.5% |
| 1-Stufe Pro | 8% | 3% / 6% | 4 at ≥0.5% |
| 2-Stufen Standard | 8% → 5% | 5% / 10% | 5 at ≥0.5% |
| 2-Stufen Pro | 7% → 5% | 5% / 8% | 3 at ≥0.5% |
1-Stufe Standard
- Evaluation targets
- 10%
- Tages- / Maximalverlust
- 4% / 7%
- Days per stage
- 5 at ≥0.5%
1-Stufe Pro
- Evaluation targets
- 8%
- Tages- / Maximalverlust
- 3% / 6%
- Days per stage
- 4 at ≥0.5%
2-Stufen Standard
- Evaluation targets
- 8% → 5%
- Tages- / Maximalverlust
- 5% / 10%
- Days per stage
- 5 at ≥0.5%
2-Stufen Pro
- Evaluation targets
- 7% → 5%
- Tages- / Maximalverlust
- 5% / 8%
- Days per stage
- 3 at ≥0.5%
A lower target and fewer qualifying days do not make Pro universally easier. A strategy must also fit the tighter maximum-loss allowance. The same trade sequence can leave different room on different programmes.
The maximum-loss type depends on the family
- Both 1-Step tiers use a static evaluation floor and a trailing simulated funded floor.
- Both 2-Step tiers keep static maximum loss through evaluation and the simulated funded stage.
- No best-day or best-trade consistency percentage applies to either tier at any stage. Qualifying days remain a separate requirement.
Was this helpful?
Keep reading
STILL STUCK?
Need a clear answer?
Contact support with the question and your account ID, if you have one. Never send your password.
